Male-female Conversation As A Form of “cross-cultural
communication” in Deborah Tannen’s “Talk in the Intimate Relationship: His and
Hers” and “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to
Talk to Each Other?”
In contemporary society, men and women
have a lot of difficulties communicating. Men can be really direct and dry, meanwhile
women can go round and round about a simple topic and express every feeling
toward it. Boys and girls are raised differently and in the long run, they
stick to their habits of communication. Peer Schneider (2011)
argues that the problem is that we live in an extremely sexist society- biased
toward women. Women constantly blame men for their masculinity, punish them for
thinking like men, and scorn them for failing to adopt the female style of
communication. Tannen states in her essay “Talk in
the Intimate Relationship: His and Hers” and “Sex, Lies, and Communication…” that
male-female conversations are a form of “cross-cultural communication”. This
term implies that there is no understanding between men and women in a conversation
because of their cultural gender differences. Although Tannen’s critics argue
that her theory of “cross-cultural communication” contains generalizations
about men and women, her theory is valid because it provides specific examples
of why men and women actually miscommunicate.
Communication is based in men and
women’s culture, as said before, boys and girls are raised differently, this
being the reason for different communication styles and different expectative
between them. As Tannen states in her essay: “From the time they’re born,
they’re treated differently, talked to differently, and talk differently as a
result” (241). Culture is an important part of a great conversation; it’s the
main source of how people talk. Boys and girls grow with a chain of habits and
patterns, or culture, that travel in contradictory perspectives building
differences in the long run of how as adults they would communicate. These
cultural differences include different expectations about the role of talk in
relationships and how it fulfills that role (Tannen 241).
Tannen’s “Talk in the Intimate
Relationship: His and Hers” and “Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why is It So Hard
for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” presents that male-female
conversation is a form of “cross-cultural communication” and proposes that
miscommunication between men and women is inherently gendered. The author’s theory
is valid as it provides specific examples of why men and women actually miscommunicate.
All the facts about the “cross-cultural communication” make Tannen’s theory
credible because they’re from authentic situations in conversations between men
and women in the actual world. These facts and examples are brought to men and
women so they can learn that between them are cultural and gender differences
that don’t let them have a fluent conversation. Tannen’s solution to the
miscommunication between men and women is that if one of them recognizes or is
aware of the differences in conversational styles, they should accept that
there are differences in habits and assumptions. Men and women should be more
conscious of the author’s solution when they are having a conversation so their
relationships can survive.